Tags
Dreamer, Dreams, enigma, life, Metaphysics, Not-Two, poem, quantum physics, reality, Twoness

Enigma
I am both watcher
and watched.
The woman walking in her garden
and the one watching her walk.
Two halves, back to back.
Both named and namer.
I am the cat in Schrödinger’s box
and the one lifting the lid.
Deborah J. Brasket, 2021
I came across this poem in a notebook I keep and decided to share it.
I’ve always had this sense of twoness. But the more I’ve learned about the nature of reality, the metaphysical as well as the quantum mechanics of it, the more sense it makes. And the more comfortable I’ve become with it, the more comforting it seems. I rather like it now. This sense of spaciousness.
It wasn’t always so. It’s something I struggled with when I was young. A sense that I wasn’t quite normal, or even quite real. I felt like I was loosely “tethered” to reality. I was in it, but also floating a bit above it at the same time.
It was hard to be in the moment, because I was always standing at the side of myself, watching. It was a bit like trying to carry on a telephone conversation when you hear the echo of your own voice at the same time.
I wrote a short story about that experience called “Fine and Shimmering,” which is how the character Sheri experienced the “tether” that kept her somehow connected to earth, to reality. I blogged about the story in “The Lightness of Being, Unbearable or Otherwise.”
Sheri was always tempted “to take that fine and shimmering thread between sharp teeth and snip it clean through. To drift aimlessly, like the merest wisp of cloud, a lingering trace of dawn, upon an otherwise immaculate sky. Awaiting that final dispersal, into the blue.”
My actual experience of the “twoness” I felt growing up was nothing nearly so drastic or literal. And in the end, I never actually “let go” of it. Instead I settled into it more comfortably by embracing the Zen notion of “not-two.” Now it’s the division between subject and object that seems more ephemeral and “not real.” I wrote at the end of my blog post this:
When that wall of “otherness” disappeared, I felt deeply connected to this ephemeral world. I felt a lightness of being that is “unbearable” only in the sense of being too sweet, too rich, too beautiful “to bear.” And so I didn’t try to hold onto it. I just let it wash though me.
I read an article in Scientific American yesterday called “Does Quantum Mechanics Reveal That Life Is But a Dream?” and discussed it with my husband. Then last night I had a dream in which several strange things were taking place and so turned to my husband, who was also in the dream, and said with amusement, “Maybe that article was right and this really is a dream.”
Only I didn’t think I was dreaming at the time. It all seemed quite real. Until I actually woke up, of course. Now it’s kind of like that old conundrum: Am I a man dreaming I was a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming I’m a man?
I rather like the idea that we could be both. And perhaps we are, or will be, when this wall of otherness finally does fall away. Maybe there is just “not-two.” Maybe the enigma is all there is.
Discover more from Deborah J. Brasket, Author
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I am at least three different people…going on four? 🌞🌞
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can relate to that!
LikeLiked by 1 person
🤗🤗
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love this post and your embracing of the two aspects of living (being and doing/spirit and material). I spent much of my life observing, rather than living it. And still fumble with embracing both aspects lightly. Kudos for melding the two into one Deborah.
LikeLike
Thank you, Brad. That really means a lot to me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great little philosophical poem, Deborah! Philosophers and quantum physicists have pondered this notion of the duality and unity of consciousness. I remember reading an interview in Life Magazine (Nov 1990) with Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, the founder of the Transcendental Meditation technique. I think part of the discussion dealt with perception in the state of ignorance vs enlightenment. I never forgot his enigmatic answer and used it as a subheading in a poem I later wrote about it. “The sight occupies the seer, transforms seer into sight.” I also end the poem with his answer to a question with a Vedantic perspective. The poem is called, Seeing Is Being. https://theuncarvedblog.com/2011/01/14/seeing-is-being/.
In that post I also reference a clip from a CBC documentary where Maharishi walks along Lake Louise using it as an analogy comparing it to the surface and depth of the mind and the impressions that fall on it to describe the nature of perception in bondage or liberation. I transcribed his explanation in this post. I link to the full show once we had permission to share it. https://theuncarvedblog.com/2010/05/09/maharishi-describes-the-nature-of-inner-life-bondage-and-liberation-and-gaining-bliss-consciousness-through-transcendental-meditation/
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Ken. And for the links. There’s so much to explore on this topic, and so many links across the ages and religions that seem to point in this direction, as science does now too. I’ll check them out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, many have spoken about this experience. A friend of mind published a book about it: The Supreme Awakening: Experiences of Enlightenment Throughout Time – And How You Can Cultivate Them https://www.amazon.com/Supreme-Awakening-Experiences-Enlightenment-Throughout/dp/0923569529
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pingback: The Enigma of Being Both Watcher and Watched – Nelsapy