Tags
creativity, experiencing joy, inspiration, leap of faith, literature, Nature, risk-taking, short story, soul-satisfying, Tamara in Her Garden, the joy of writing, why I write, why write?, writing

Writing—or any creative endeavor—to some extent is a leap of faith and a huge personal risk: Faith that what you have to offer others will be worth the time it takes to read your work and will add something of value to their lives. And the risk, of course, that you will fail in this attempt, that the work you take such pleasure in creating, and spend so much time and effort on, will not be read or have the effect on the reader you had hoped.
So why take that leap, that risk? Interestingly, I found some clues for why we write in one of my short stories, “Tamara in Her Garden.” It’s because of where we are leaping and why. Here are those clues from the story told by the main character, Tamara:
There is an old Taoist saying: Things are created out of their innermost intuition. I see myself that way, a creation of my own intuition. I pick and choose among the rubble of my life, the memory, dreams and fantasies that please or surprise, and so create myself. Not so much a thing of beauty but of bone and balance, voluptuously detailed and ever changing. I would not complete myself if I could.
Later on in the story Tamara explains why she spends so much time in her garden:
Justin thinks of this garden as my asylum . . . . A place of refuge where I sequester myself from reality. I do not see it as such. I see my garden as highly invigorating and precarious, teeming with raw necessity, a microcosm of all the life and beauty, decay and death, that ever was. I stand in my round garden as if standing upon the edge of a precipice, poised for flight. Not to escape, but to delve more deeply.
When we write, it’s as if we are leaping off the edge of a precipice, of life as we live it on the surface, and diving into the unknown, into our innermost intuitions and the half-forgotten memories, dreams, and fantasies that please or surprise, haunt or terrorize us. In some ways, we are diving into the collective unconscious—everyone and everything we have ever known or heard of or read about going back to that time and space in reality or imagination where the morning stars first sang together.
We do it to ferret out and piece together our own song, a more complete and comprehensive understanding of ourselves, our world, and each other—to discover what’s missing, fill in the gaps, piece together what’s puzzling, bind what’s broken, complete what’s been left undone or unspoken, reclaim what’s been lost or forgotten.
We do so to find and follow the threads that weave it all back into some meaningful whole. We do it even while knowing that nothing is ever really completed, but continually evolves. This open-endedness is what makes it all so highly invigorating and precarious. Seeking that “something more” . . . .
I imagine we read for the same reason we write, to delve more deeply into life, the known and unknown parts of ourselves and our world, seeking the “something more” that lies ever so tantalizingly just out of reach, and might perhaps be grasped or at least fingered ever so lightly and stirringly in the next book or poem or essay we read.
Emily Dickinson once wrote: “If I feel physically as if the top of my head were taken off, I know that is poetry.” Franz Kafka said: “If the book we are reading does not wake us, as with a fist hammering on our skull, why then do we read it? . . . . A book must be an ice-axe to break the sea frozen inside us.” That’s why I read, to experience that. And I write for the same reason.
After that last excerpt are the last lines in the story. Tamara says:
In some strange way, I am everything I have ever known. I am my father. And my Aunt Rose too.
The story about Tamara came about when I tried to imagine how it would feel if I were the daughter of some Jeffrey Dahmer type character. If I had lived with him as a child and had some inkling of the evil he was doing, would I try to stop him? Would I set the house on fire one night while he was sleeping to end it? Or as I escaped the fire and hid in the garden, watching the house burn down, would I imagine (or hope) that I was the one brave enough (or evil enough) to do so? How would I cope after all that? How would I heal? In the story her aunt and her garden become the saving graces in her life.
I think that’s why I write too—to “become” everything and everyone I’ve ever known. To step into that skin, that character’s lived experience, and allow them to tell me who they are and how they feel. To struggle with and try to reconcile in some way the vast beauty and brutality we find in this world and how they are rolled together.
In another excerpt, as Tamara wrestles with not knowing for sure if she was the one who set the house on fire that night or only imagined she had done so, she tells us:
Sometimes I feel there is scant difference between a thing imagined and the actual event. In the passage of time, each is rendered mere memory, mere sensory image stored in the mind, anyway. What then separates the one from the other? All of one’s life, all of the long and homely details spun out across time are rolled up neatly, in the end, in one’s mind . . . . So what difference is there between an actual event that occurred with careless inattention and a thing imagined in meticulous detail? What is more concrete: the forgotten fact or the fiction seared forever in one’s mind?
Fiction that is “seared forever” in our minds is something that has deeply touched us, that rings true, and usually, in some important or moving way, adds to a deeper or more complete understanding of the world and each other. Fiction in this way is sometimes more real, truer, than fact. What poet Wallace Stevens called “the supreme fiction.”
Before I began writing today, I had only a vague sense of how I would explain why I write, and I had no idea the story “Tamara in Her Garden” had anything to say on that subject.
Until I wrote this, I was not consciously aware that the garden “teeming with raw necessity” could be seen as a symbol for the ground out of which the creative act emerges and healing takes place.
Perhaps that’s the simplest way to look at why we write and why we read, to heal what ails us, to make whole when we’re being torn apart. Even when we write or read for entertainment or escape, to leave the drudgery or stress or ordinariness of our daily lives, to transport ourselves to some more interesting or exciting world beyond ourselves and our immediate concerns, perhaps even this is an effort to heal what ails us, if only in bringing some enjoyment into our lives. For what’s more healing or soul-satisfying than the experiencing of joy?
This is why I make that leap of faith, take that risk, in writing, because regardless of the outcome, whether read or not, published or not, the act of writing itself, the pursuit of that “something more,” is so soul-satisfying and immensely enjoyable. And joy wants sharing.
(Photo by Josh Eckel, skydiver Andrew Staich (my son-in-law)
NOTE: I first wrote this post (slightly altered here) the year I began blogging. And now, so many years later, that leap of faith has led to the publishing of my first novel When Things Go Missing, which will be out for pre-order soon. While writing here on my blog has been immensely soul-satisfying, as has writing this novel, the publishing part has had it’s highs and lows–until recently, that is. Now its all uphill.
With so many wonderful reviews coming in from readers of advanced copies, I feel like the novel is already a success. I am so grateful to everyone who has read and reviewed my novel so far and to all who may read it in the future. You can find out more about When Things Go Missing and read some of the reviews on my Novel Page.
Discover more from Deborah J. Brasket, Author
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Why do I write? For the challenge. To see, once I come up with an idea, if I can turn it into a story. That’s about it. It’s why I don’t stay in one genre. Part of the challenge is to write different stories and to tell stories in different ways. If I only wrote in one genre, the challenge would be less.
Good luck with your first novel!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes! The challenge. That’s part of it for me too. Writing, plotting, editing–all of it is so interesting, and “watching” to see what the characters do, what they think. As far as genres go, my next novel (already written) is less literary, more commercial, a coming of age love story set during a revolution in Central America in the 70’s–lots of politics, protests, police brutality, espionage, etc, including romance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amazing Deborah, congratulations! The why follows us through all our creative work, I think.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think you are right, VJ. Thank you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Welcome
LikeLike
This is a lovely perspective on why you write Deborah, and kudos on your good reviews.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much, Brad!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Two heavy nods as I read, Deborah:
Re: Tamara’s garden and is appeal, “Not to escape, but to delve more deeply.”
And the calling within us: “…the simplest way to look at why we write and why we read, to heal what ails us, to make whole when we’re being torn apart.”
Oof! Yes, yes. The joy of creating and the soul satisfaction. Published or not. Thank you so much and continued congrats with the positive buzz for “When Things Go Missing”. xo! 💕
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really appreciate that, Vicki, sharing what struck you in Tamara (still unpublished!). And thanks so much for the kudos and the positive buzz!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You betcha…love catching up with you and learning about Tamara! 🥰
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Deborah. Wow! How perfectly written. Thank you for the insights. I particularly like your words: “When we write, it’s as if we are leaping off the edge of a precipice, of life as we live it on the surface, and diving into the unknown, into our innermost intuitions and the half-forgotten memories, dreams, and fantasies that please or surprise, haunt or terrorize us. In some ways, we are diving into the collective unconscious—everyone and everything we have ever known or heard of or read about going back to that time and space in reality or imagination where the morning stars first sang together.
We do it to ferret out and piece together our own song, a more complete and comprehensive understanding of ourselves, our world, and each other—to discover what’s missing, fill in the gaps, piece together what’s puzzling, bind what’s broken, complete what’s been left undone or unspoken, reclaim what’s been lost or forgotten.”
As I absolutely resonate with them. The whole post is so apt. Thank you for exploring on this topic.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you so much, Hanna, for coming here and reading. I’m so glad it resonated with you. It means so much when another writer connects with what I’ve written
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are very welcome Deborah! I also appreciate your visit and the like on my poem 🙂 Thank you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As usual, a great interconnected piece that reflects how creatives live. But also, I relate to the aspect of being the person who has lived all the years before and am still becoming into the person in the days ahead…you verbalize and add so many supportive sources/quotes that make it clear life is not some shallow screen performance…just sayin’…
hugs
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Flower-sister! I always love your comments. You always get straight to the heart of things. Hugs!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow- thanks for letting me know. I often think my comments don’t make much sense to anyone else but myself! Must be we’re on the same snapdragon wavelength, eh?! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, we’re on the same wavelength, and you always have great replies!
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Sometimes I feel there is scant difference between a thing imagined and the actual event.” In fact researchers have succeeded in implanting false memories in people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Steve. I’ve heard about that too. Memory is such a tricky thing. We see things through such a narrow perspective and often colored with our prejudices, hopes and fears. Even without anyone implanting things, we often miss what’s really there. I guess that’s why eye-witness reports of crimes and accidents rarely align.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And just to expand on this …
We don’t really see the whole of the picture ourselves anyway, when we look out through our eyes. We generalize, delete and distort the information coming through our senses, to make sense of it. We use our internal ‘filters’ to do so in order to stay sane and not to get overwhelmed by all the little bits. Each of us looks out through a unique lens.
And then our memories…they are only small fragments recorded with an emotion for impact. Through pictures, sounds etc. we ‘remember’….yet every time we revisit a memory, it changes! That’s very interesting that they figured a way to implant them in people.
Also it is a very fine line between our real day to day reality and the dream world (imagined).
Just think of it, it’s all recorded in our mind the same way….sometimes it is hard to distinguish between what was real and what was only dreamed about.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There’s a famous Spanish play from 1635 by Pedro Calderón de la Barca called La Vida es Sueño, Life is a Dream. Probably the best known passage from it is:
¿Qué es la vida? Un frenesí.
¿Qué es la vida? Una ilusión,
una sombra, una ficción,
y el mayor bien es pequeño;
que toda la vida es sueño,
y los sueños, sueños son.
What is life? A frenzy.
What is life? An illusion,
a shadow, a fiction,
and the greatest good is small;
because all life is a dream,
and dreams [themselves] are [only] dreams.
LikeLike
Thanks for commenting on my comment Steve…
In that play:”and the greatest good is small”what does this relate to? is it correctly translated? Thanks
LikeLiked by 1 person
I haven’t read or seen the whole play, so I don’t know the background for that line.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love that! Thank for sharing, Steve. Then there’s Shakespeare’s “We are such stuff as dream’s are made of and our little lives are rounded by a sleep.” Interestingly, my next post is about a song I heard in a dream and wrote down that still mesmerizes me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So true, Hanna! I love that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And yes, the translation is accurate. A rhyming and rhythmic English version renders the line “its greatest good not worth a whit.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Steve. Would you please expand on this? How do you understand it yourself? I am a bit perplexed by that statement in that context. Thanks, and thanks Deborah.. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
All of the following is AI’s take:
The phrase “el mayor bien es pequeño” translates literally to “the greatest good is small”. This phrase is most famously associated with Pedro Calderón de la Barca’s play La vida es sueño (Life Is a Dream).
In the context of the play, it’s part of a powerful monologue by the character Segismundo, who reflects on the illusory nature of life.
Here is a breakdown of the interpretation:
In summary, “el mayor bien es pequeño” means that in the face of life’s illusory nature and transience, even what is considered the greatest good is ultimately of little consequence
LikeLiked by 2 people
It reminds me now of the saying from Ecclesiastes: “Vanity of vanities, all is vanity.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks Steve. Now that makes more sense to me. As I was looking at the ‘good’ in that sentence as ‘doing good’ rather than ‘having good’.. Thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person